Currently Browsing: Dangerous Pharmaceuticals

Will Xarelto Cause Internal Bleeding?

There is evidence that supports the claim that the drug causes numerous detrimental side effects on a person through the numerous cases and complaints legally filed against the manufacturers of Xarelto, Bayer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011, this anticoagulant has become notably popular, especially as a preventative measure against deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in hip or knee replacement surgery patients.

Several people have come forth and said that taking Xarelto has caused severe internal bleeding, specifically in the gastrointestinal tract as well as the brain through hemorrhaging. Smaller side effects that could prelude these complications are discolored urine (red, pink, or brown), stool that has a similar consistency with coffee grounds, muscle weakness, and intense headaches. For women, severe menstrual flow can also be a sign of internal bleeding.

Internal bleeding can cause a lot of damage in the body. If an organ is suddenly surrounded with the bleeding, the blood flow concerning the organ could be disrupted and the organ in question could malfunction or cease to function entirely. If a vein in the brain is blocked and causes for the vein to rupture, otherwise known as a brain hemorrhage, it can cause spasms or even strokes that could render the victim permanently disabled or even cause the victim’s death.

There are also several reports, according to the website of Williams Kherkher, that the manufacturers were aware of these side effects but did not properly label them before distribution. Also, there is a notable lack of procedures to be followed should the side effects of Xarelto happen, thereby delaying a proper response, which could cause severely irreparable damage to a patient and the patient’s family.

If you or someone you know has experienced internal bleeding due to Xarelto, it is recommended to seek the attention of professional legal help for aid in the endeavor of bringing these manufacturers to just accountability for their harmful pharmaceuticals.

Brain Hemorrhaging Due to Xarelto

Xarelto, a controversial anticoagulant that was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2011 for treatment of deep vein thrombosis, is known to cause serious side effects that can be life threatening. One of the most severe side effects the drug causes is brain hemorrhaging. A brain hemorrhage is a type of stroke that occurs when an artery in the brain bursts and causes bleeding that can kill brain cells and permanently damage integral brain function.

A brain hemorrhage can develop from a number of issues. Most often a blunt force trauma causes the bleeding to occur. The bleeding then causes parts of the brain to swell from irritation, creating a pool of blood called a hematoma. The bleed can occur within the brain, between the brain and the protective membrane surrounding it, or between the skull and membrane. The cerebral hemorrhaging then puts pressure on delicate brain tissue, damaging brain cells.

Along with serious brain damage, other side effects of a brain hemorrhage include severe headaches, seizures, changes in vision, loss of motor functions, and loss of consciousness. Surgery is often required to alleviate the swelling in the brain and prevent further damage from occurring.

Medications like Xarelto can cause and worsen brain hemorrhages by sustaining the bleeding episode. The blood thinner stops the blood from clotting and causes greater blood loss and uncontrolled internal bleeding. Unlike other blood thinners, Xarelto does not have a reversal agent to stop bleeding when these types of incidents occur. Patients prescribed Xarelto are susceptible to greater injury due to the irreversible effects of the dangerous drug.

Negligent drug manufacturers release dangerous drugs that cause patients to suffer from severe physical and emotional pain. If you or a loved one experienced a serious bleeding incident or brain hemorrhage while prescribed Xarelto, click here to read more about your legal options.

Staying Alive: The Negative Effects of Actos

To be told that you have cancer is one of the most horrifying statements ever heard. If you were being hunted down by a mercenary or something, there is someone directly to blame – there is someone to stop. Cancer is hardly ever the same case. It involves cells that do not behave the same way other cells do; these are insidious cells that dare to be alive, killing everything else. Usually, there is no one to blame. Usually, yes, but not always.

Such is the case of bladder cancer caused by Actos. Actos is a drug used to treat people with Type 2 diabetes (or ‘non-insulin dependent diabetes’) and is sometimes referred to as being a safer alternative to that of another drug of a similar nature, Avandia. According to the website of Williams Kherkher, however, there has been recent news that links bladder cancer as having developed due to the intake of this defective drug. A severe side effect such as this cannot be simply brushed off as the consequences of cancer are quite life-altering and require action.

If you or someone you know is currently in this situation, you might be asking yourselves: what can you do about it?

You can hold the people responsible as accountable for this additional grievance on your life. And yes, though cancer is sometimes sudden and due to nothing at all, sometimes there is a party to blame – and this is one of those times. Cancer is an expensive disease to treat, depending on if you were fortunate enough to have had the cancer detected while it was still highly treatable, and bladder cancer has a higher risk of recurrence, which is why survivors of this disease often get themselves regularly checked just in case.

If your cancer was caused by the taking of Actos then you might be eligible to receive compensation for the damage that the drug has done upon your person.

Xarelto Litigation Looms on Horizon

Xarelto lawsuits are heating up but far from all in. The first uncontrollable bleeding complaint was filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) and manufacturer Bayer barely two years after it was first approved as an anticoagulant by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011. This was due to dangerous Xarelto side effects, primarily irreversible bleeding. Since then, more than 21 cases have been filed in 10 jurisdictions so that an application has been made to consolidate the cases into multidistrict litigation with the Southern District of Illinois in early October 2014. Personal injury lawyers are predicting more are in the works given its similarity of circumstances with another anticoagulant that took a beating in court: Pradaxa.

Side effects are common in prescription drugs, but in most cases the benefits outweigh the risks. In the case of the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), plaintiffs agree that it is too dangerous to be sold. Pradaxa first, and then Xarelto was introduced as the better alternative to the finicky standard anticoagulant therapy using warfarin. There was no need for diet changes or regular monitoring to adjust dosage with the new anticoagulants, which made it more convenient and less expensive in the long run. This is the reason why Xarelto earned its principals more than $500 million in sales in the first year it was introduced, and by 2013 this increased to $2 billion.

However, the new drugs also had no reversal agent, which meant that if the blood was thinned too much, it could result in uncontrollable bleeding. The fact that regular monitoring was not required according to its manufacturers, the side effects of these dangerous pharmaceutical products could easily get out of control. Any intervention in uncontrollable bleeding (for both Pradaxa and Xarelto) was palliative; all the patient could do was to wait for the drug to run its course and to allow coagulation to take place.